Campaign materials from Casey Shorts, a candidate for Milwaukee County Supervisor, listed a supporter with an ACLU affiliation. We wish to clarify that the ACLU is a nonpartisan organization that does not support, oppose or endorse candidates.

Date

Monday, April 2, 2018 - 7:30pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

22

Style

Standard with sidebar
Wisconsin voters elected Judge Rebecca Dallet to the state supreme court, and—as part of a new effort to inform more voters on the importance of civil liberties issues—the American Civil Liberties Union worked strenuously to engage its members in Wisconsin as well as many thousands more who are part of the ACLU’s statewide network of supporters.
 
“The results of this election show the importance of voting. By turning out, voters help to set the direction of our state for years to come,” said Chris Ott, executive director of the ACLU of Wisconsin. "But our work is not done. We will continue to focus on turnout and giving voters information about where candidates stand on civil rights and liberties."
 
“With civil liberties issues on the line, the ACLU made an unprecedented effort to inform Wisconsin voters on the key issues in the Supreme Court race and get them to the polls. We mailed the results of our candidate questionnaire on such areas as voting rights, criminal justice reform, immigrants’ rights, reproductive freedom, and LGBT rights to more than 40,000 people across the state. ACLU volunteers in cities such as Appleton, Green Bay, Madison, and Milwaukee also made thousands of get-out-the-vote phone calls to make sure these matters were front of mind when voting. Tonight’s results demonstrate that voters are demanding more progress from the court on civil rights and civil liberties,” said Faiz Shakir, national political director of the ACLU.
 
“Voting in 2018 has only just begun, and elections later this year could potentially change the course of both our state and our country. Those who need help getting the ID they need to vote or getting to the polls—or who want to volunteer to help other voters—can call our Voting Rights Project in Wisconsin at608-285-2141,” said Molly McGrath, a Madison-based ACLU voting rights attorney and organizer.
 
The ACLU’s Wisconsin spring election questionnaire is available here:  https://peoplepower.org/wisconsin-supreme-court/
 
The ACLU has an ongoing challenge to Wisconsin’s restrictive voter ID law, Frank v. Walker, and is involved in the critical Wisconsin challenge to unfair maps for legislative districts that favor one political party. The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on the mapping case, Gill v. Whitford, this year.
 
The ACLU does not endorse or oppose any candidate for office. The ACLU’s goal is to promote voter education and voter participation.

Date

Tuesday, April 3, 2018 - 7:30pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

22

Style

Standard with sidebar

The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Wisconsin, and the law firm of Covington & Burling have served reports by three experts regarding the Milwaukee Police Department’s (“MPD”) stop-and-frisk program, in the class-action lawsuit Collins v. City of Milwaukee.  All three experts agree that the MPD promotes stops made without reasonable suspicion as required by law, disproportionately subjecting people of color to stigmatizing police encounters. The reports are being released publicly to ensure that the information and analyses they contain is available to Milwaukee residents as they move forward with community conversations regarding MPD policies and practices.

Margo L. Fraiser is an expert with more than 40 years of law enforcement and criminal justice experience, including as the Police Monitor for the City of Austin, Texas; the Sheriff of Travis County, Texas; and the President of the Major County Sheriffs’ Association.  Frasier made the following findings:

  • Records of more than 350,000 stops conducted between 2010 and 2017 failed to show that Milwaukee police had reasonable suspicion of criminal activity or a traffic or vehicle equipment violation, as required by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
  • These violations encompassed both pedestrian stops and traffic stops.  For example, 48 percent of traffic stop and 59 percent of pedestrian stop records from 2010 to 2017, from one of MPD’s primary stop databases, lack information establishing any legal justification for those stops.  
  • MPD fails to collect information about frisks, leading to a lack of documentation of the reasons for frisks that prevents MPD leadership and supervisors from ensuring that officers only frisk people when they have an objective, individualized, and reasonable suspicion that a person is armed and dangerous, as required by the Fourth Amendment.

David Abrams is Professor of Law, Business Economics, and Public Policy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and of Business Economics and Public Policy at The Wharton School.  Abrams made the following findings:

  • Traffic stops in Milwaukee are concentrated in predominantly Black and Latino police districts.  The rate of traffic stops in predominantly Black Districts 3 and 5 and predominantly Latino District 2 are more than triple the rate of traffic stops in predominantly white District 6.
  • Black and Latino people are more likely than white people to be subject to traffic stops across Milwaukee, including in police districts in which the residential population is predominantly white.  For example, in Districts 1 and 6, Black and Latino people experienced traffic stops rates that were over six and over three times the white stop rate, respectively.
  • The traffic stop rate for Black drivers in Milwaukee is more than six times the traffic stop rate for white drivers, even after controlling for non-racial factors that might account for such disparities.   The same is true of the pedestrian stop rate for Black people as compared to white people across Milwaukee.
  • Black people are also far more likely to be searched during traffic stops, even though the overall rate of drug or weapon discovery is very low overall and lower for Black and Latino people than for white people.
  • Traffic stop searches of Black and Latino drivers are more than 20 percent less likely to lead to the discovery of drugs than traffic stop searches of white drivers, even after controlling for non-racial and non-ethnic factors that might account for such disparities.                             

Finally, Prof. Emeritus Samuel Walker of the University of Nebraska-Omaha Department of Criminal Justice, a nationally-known expert on policing practices, concluded that the MPD’s stop and frisk practices are deeply ingrained in the MPD and show a failure of supervision and oversight to ensure constitutional stop practices

These exhaustive reports make clear what hundreds of thousands of Black and Latino people—including the nine Plaintiffs in this case— know from their everyday lives: MPD stops and frisks are routinely conducted without legal justification and on the basis of race and ethnicity.

David Abrams Report is listed below.

 

Date

Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - 5:30pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Documents

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

22

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Wisconsin RSS